The CEO & President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Mary C. Daly Sees Cautious Optimism in the Economy, Says the Goal is an Inflation Rate of 2 Percent 

The president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Mary C. Daly delivered remarks on monetary policy and the economy at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco which is in a sweet location at 110 Embarcadero, in between Fisherman’s Wharf and AT+T Park where the San Francisco Giants play. (Photo of Deirdre Bosa of CNBC and Daly is by Jeannie Entin.)

Naturally Daly focused on inflation and jobs which is what a lot of we citizens care about the most. I was dismayed seeing my dog Ringo’s Rachel Ray brand dog food go from $17 to $34 due to inflation. The good news is that the new cost has stuck for a while. If it doesn’t go up soon I’ll be happy! (The Ringo photo by me is below. He’s a big boy and eats a lot of dog food.)

Daly, who holds an undergrad degree from University of Illinois and a PhD from Syracuse University, said, “We (The Federal Reserve) need to restore price stability and do so without a painful impact on the economy.” She added, “We are still in a fight to bring inflation down to two percent.” 

What is Inflation at Now? 

Inflation looks like it’s around three percent according to the U.S. Inflation Calculator website. This is a very cool chart. Check out the year it was at 7%. 

She said that people are confident that inflation will come down to two percent. She added that the decline in unemployment is declining more slowly than the decline in inflation. Monetary policy is working but it will take more work, added Daly.  She also said that the Bay Area has a lot of innovation that could come and help productivity. She touched on supply and demand and how that affects the economy. (Argh. Thoughts of Econ 101 and 102 undergrad classes are flowing back into my brain. I simultaneously love and hate this topic. Understanding the economy is important if you have a career in public relations. We typically spend a lot of time with company leaders and sometimes advice on business strategy.)

But, Daly added, things are pretty much in balance, in regards to demand and supply of workers. 

Look back to 2022 Daly says. At one point, unemployment was very low and job vacancies were high. As interest rates rose, the vacancies reversed. In April 2024, the vacancies slid down, as per her graphic. We need to have the labor market slow down a bit to bring inflation down, says Daly.  

My opinion is this is the stressful thing about the economy. If companies hire a lot they have less money. They lay off and stock prices might go up. Running a business is tricky business! Back to Mary…

Mary C. Daly summarized by saying, “We are in a better place than 2023. Inflation has come down and the labor market is solid. But we are not there yet. To thrive, people need price stability and jobs.”

I can hear that Queen song in my head. “I want it all. And I want it now.” Balance is hard but I think the Fed is doing a good job. Hopefully my beloved Rachel Ray dog food will stay the same price for a long time!

As an aside, Daly is a great speaker and from the MidWest like me. I could hear that Midwest roots vibe in her messages. Although I love the location of the Embarcadero near all of the cool touristy stuff, I attended Daly’s talk online.

Thanks San Francisco Press Club for streaming it and making it very easy to attend. I serve on the board of PRSA Silicon Valley with Curtis Sparrer who is the president of the SF Press Club and he extended a personal invitation to me. Curtis is a busy bee.

Look for a more detailed story on this talk from Jennifer Yoder on the PRSA Silicon Valley website soon. Deirdre Bosa, anchor of CNBC’s tech-focused franchise, “TechCheck,” based out of the network’s San Francisco Bureau, interviewed Mary C. Daly on stage after her remarks. Yoder’s story will incorporate more of what Bosa said. Here is the YouTube video URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrY3957xQ-A

In closing, here is a reminder of what we learned in econ 101 class taken verbatim from the Federal reserve website:

How does the Federal Reserve affect inflation and employment?

As the Federal Reserve conducts monetary policy, it influences employment and inflation primarily through using its policy tools to influence the availability and cost of credit in the economy.

The primary tool the Federal Reserve uses to conduct monetary policy is the federal funds rate—the rate that banks pay for overnight borrowing in the federal funds market. Changes in the federal funds rate influence other interest rates that in turn influence borrowing costs for households and businesses as well as broader financial conditions.

For example, when interest rates go down, it becomes cheaper to borrow, so households are more willing to buy goods and services, and businesses are in a better position to purchase items to expand their businesses, such as property and equipment. Businesses can also hire more workers, influencing employment. And the stronger demand for goods and services may push wages and other costs higher, influencing inflation.

During economic downturns, the Fed may lower the federal funds rate to its lower bound near zero. In such times, if additional support is desired, the Fed can use other tools to influence financial conditions in support of its goals.

However, there are many factors that affect inflation and employment. And while the linkages from monetary policy to both inflation and employment are not direct or immediate, monetary policy is an important factor.

###

Michelle McIntyre is a PR consultant, IBM vet and head of marketing for PRSA Silicon Valley. She is a Quora influencer in the area of elite college admissions, with 1.9 million views there. McIntyre, a graduate of Ohio University’s EW Scripps School of Journalism currently has a 4.0 GPA in Stanford Continuing Studies. Jeannie Entin who snapped the beautiful event photo for this story is the president-elect of PRSA Silicon Valley.

Journalists Caution When Using GenAI to Write, Beware of Dullness

By Michelle McIntyre

A panel of business journalists gathered at Microsoft in Mountain View, Calif., last night as part of a San Francisco Press Club event to discuss how generative AI has affected their jobs.

One participant, Michael Nuñez of VentureBeat made bold predictions. He’s an advocate of using GenAI regularly at work. The other participants seemed to have more of a ‘proceed with caution’ attitude.

Nuñez predicted that Generative AI will be bigger than Google. 

He went even bolder saying that GenAI is as big as the smartphone.

On top of that he quipped, “In one year AI will have touched every aspect of the journalism process.” Yes, he used the word, “every.” 

Nuñez went into detail about how he uses AI as sort of a smart intern to do some research and writing to save him and his team time. He and the others agreed that it’s important to edit and fact check all AI work. 

They also agreed that prose could be biased.

Although most of their newsroom teams were using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in some way and already had guidelines for its use, none thought that AI would replace them in their jobs in the next five years.

In addition to Nuñez, the journalist panelists were Mr. Boone Ashworth of WIRED, Krystal Hu of Reuters, Julie Jammot of Agence Free Press, Mr. Chris Matyszczyk contributor to CNET and ZDNet, Ben Pimentel of San Francisco Examiner, and Jon Swartz of Marketwatch. Rachel Metz, now with Bloomberg, moderated.

100 Million Downloads in Two Months

It was nice to walk into the event with the Reuters group, by chance, since we arrived at the same time. What a beautiful campus by the way. I was happy to get to know Krystal Hu a bit since I had been frequently quoting data from her GenAI story several times recently in business conversations.

Hu had written that ChatGPT, the most popular flavor of GenAI, had the fastest growing user base of any consumer app. It achieved 100 million downloads in two months. This is faster than both Netflix and TikTok. 

Have a ‘Wild West’ mentality when using GenAI

Panelists advised the audience to keep in mind that AI could produce misinformation, and it is helpful to have an AI-use company guidelines.

Jon Swartz said you have to deal with GenAI with a ‘Wild West’ mentality because it’s something new. 

He added that he likes talking to other humans in the newsroom to brainstorm clever phrases. He said, AI can’t do this. 

AI Needs to Lighten Up

My thoughts mirror Swartz’s. We’re in Wild West territory. I  asked Bing chat to write me a biography and it was good but not special. It referenced five sources, but it didn’t have that special pizazz or flare. 

Like I might write, “Michelle likes tossing tennis balls to her big dog, Ringo.” If Bing were clever and funny, it would have added that to my bio. However, I was impressed that Bing spelled out the word “veteran.” It said, “McIntyre is an IBM veteran.” That’s more proper than “vet.” I always write, “vet.” 

Why Delegate Something that’s Fun to Do?

AFP’s Julie Jammot said that she’d never want AI to replace the main writing that she does, calling that task fun. She said that the problem with AI writing is that the language is too uniform. 

Got Misinformation?

Columnist Chris Matyszczyk offered clever quips summarizing his attitude which was that AI is sort of badly useful. He mentioned misinformation a few times, and others readily agreed with his points. 

Boone Ashworth said that WIRED did a good job at laying out their use of AI guidelines. Most of the others on the panel said their newsrooms have guidelines as well.  Ashworth seemed the most chill about using AI. For example, he said, it can be useful if you need to ask AI for a recipe of what dish to make as a meal.

Attribute or Don’t Attribute? That is the Question.

There was disagreement about whether or not a story needs to have AI attribution. That means putting, “Written by AI.” Most said it’s essential that AI be mentioned in attribution for many reasons. Nunez disagreed saying, it is just a tool. You wouldn’t note that Adobe Photoshop was used to make an image.

Krystal Hu from Reuters smartly brought up the infamous “stop progress letter.” She said, “The smartest minds are ringing the alarm on AI.” Ben Pimentel added that a pause in advancement is not practical, but it is good that the letter generated conversation.

The president of San Francisco Press Club, Curtis Sparrer of Bospar, introduced the panelists and Microsoft executives served as gracious hosts with warm welcomes, intelligent remarks and a nice food and beverage spread. 

###

Michelle McIntyre is a Silicon Valley public relations consultant, IBM veteran, and head of editorial content for PRSA SV. She’s a ranked future of work influencer who likes to play fetch with her big dog Ringo. Photo descriptions: 1) Entire panel with ‘AI’ on the screen in the back. Credit: San Francisco Press Club 2) Curtis of Bospar with a microphone 3) Jon of Marketwatch and Julie of AFP, the side of Rachel’s face 4) Boone of WIRED with the navy shirt 5) Chris with a gray t-shirt 6) Ben of SF Examiner with the green shirt
Photos 2-6 were taken by Michelle McIntyre with her new iPhone 14 Pro. Watch the entire panel discussion by visiting this link.